DBV Bundesliga
1. Baseball Bundesliga
2. Baseball Bundesliga
Softball Bundesliga
 
 
Archiv
 
 
Statistiken Deutscher Baseball und Softball Verband 
 

Stand: 2018-09-09

Team Ranking 2. Bundesliga Süd

Offense

Batting Average

#TeamAVGAB  HHRR
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.3087382274179
2Stuttgart Reds 2.2967422207191
 Tübingen Hawks.2967582246214
4Neuenburg Atomics.2876982000180
 League Average.2787171993.0164
5Karlsruhe Cougars.2546881750116
6Göppingen Green Sox.2537001773146
7Nagold Mohawks.2476971721119

Slugging Percentage

#TeamSLG AB TB1B2B3BHRTB/H
1Tübingen Hawks.398758302169381161.35
 Stuttgart Reds 2.39874229516640771.34
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.38273828218925941.24
 League Average.345717248163285.73.01.24
4Neuenburg Atomics.34469824016628601.20
5Göppingen Green Sox.31770022214130331.25
6Karlsruhe Cougars.28868819815517301.13
7Nagold Mohawks.27869719415317111.13

On-Base Percentage

#TeamOBP AB  HBBHPSF
1Stuttgart Reds 2.4187422201412415
2Neuenburg Atomics.4106982001342112
 Tübingen Hawks.410758224121316
4Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.4037382271012715
 League Average.391717199113279.4
5Karlsruhe Cougars.370688175100284
6Göppingen Green Sox.36470017792347
7Nagold Mohawks.359697172105217

On-Base Plus Slugging

#TeamOPS AB  H2B3BHRBBHPSF
1Stuttgart Reds 2.81574222040771412415
2Tübingen Hawks.80975822438116121316
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.78573822725941012715
4Neuenburg Atomics.75469820028601342112
 League Average.737717199285.73.0113279.4
5Göppingen Green Sox.681700177303392347
6Karlsruhe Cougars.6576881751730100284
7Nagold Mohawks.6376971721711105217

Hits

#TeamH1B2B3BHR
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 22271892594
2Tübingen Hawks22416938116
3Stuttgart Reds 22201664077
4Neuenburg Atomics2001662860
 League Average199163285.73.0
5Göppingen Green Sox1771413033
6Karlsruhe Cougars1751551730
7Nagold Mohawks1721531711

Doubles

#Team2B
1Stuttgart Reds 240
2Tübingen Hawks38
3Göppingen Green Sox30
4Neuenburg Atomics28
 League Average28
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 225
6Nagold Mohawks17
 Karlsruhe Cougars17

Triples

#Team3B
1Tübingen Hawks11
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 29
3Stuttgart Reds 27
4Neuenburg Atomics6
 League Average5.7
5Göppingen Green Sox3
 Karlsruhe Cougars3
7Nagold Mohawks1

Homeruns

#TeamHR
1Stuttgart Reds 27
2Tübingen Hawks6
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 24
 League Average3.0
4Göppingen Green Sox3
5Nagold Mohawks1
6Karlsruhe Cougars0
 Neuenburg Atomics0

Runs Scored

#TeamRR-diff
1Tübingen Hawks21489+125
2Stuttgart Reds 2191151+40
3Neuenburg Atomics18099+81
4Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2179123+56
 League Average1641640
5Göppingen Green Sox146226-80
6Nagold Mohawks119242-123
7Karlsruhe Cougars116215-99

Walks

#TeamBB
1Stuttgart Reds 2141
2Neuenburg Atomics134
3Tübingen Hawks121
 League Average113
4Nagold Mohawks105
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2101
6Karlsruhe Cougars100
7Göppingen Green Sox92

Walk Ratio (highest)

#TeamBB/PA  BB PA
1Stuttgart Reds 215.2%141927
 Neuenburg Atomics15.2%134883
3Tübingen Hawks13.2%121916
 League Average13.0%113875
4Nagold Mohawks12.6%105836
5Karlsruhe Cougars11.9%100841
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 211.4%101885
7Göppingen Green Sox11.0%92840

Strikeouts

#TeamK
1Nagold Mohawks167
2Stuttgart Reds 2151
3Göppingen Green Sox149
 League Average135
4Karlsruhe Cougars129
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2127
6Tübingen Hawks120
7Neuenburg Atomics102

Strikeout Ratio (lowest)

#TeamK/AB  K AB
1Neuenburg Atomics14.6%102698
2Tübingen Hawks15.8%120758
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 217.2%127738
4Karlsruhe Cougars18.8%129688
 League Average18.8%135717
5Stuttgart Reds 220.4%151742
6Göppingen Green Sox21.3%149700
7Nagold Mohawks24.0%167697

Hit By Pitch

#TeamHP
1Göppingen Green Sox34
2Tübingen Hawks31
3Karlsruhe Cougars28
4Heidenheim Heideköpfe 227
 League Average27
5Stuttgart Reds 224
6Nagold Mohawks21
 Neuenburg Atomics21

Sacrifice Flies

#TeamSF
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 215
 Stuttgart Reds 215
3Neuenburg Atomics12
 League Average9.4
4Göppingen Green Sox7
 Nagold Mohawks7
6Tübingen Hawks6
7Karlsruhe Cougars4

Sacrifice Hits

#TeamSH
1Karlsruhe Cougars21
2Neuenburg Atomics18
 League Average8.7
3Göppingen Green Sox7
4Nagold Mohawks6
5Stuttgart Reds 25
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 24
7Tübingen Hawks0

Percentage of Baserunners Stranded

#TeamLOB%LOBR
1Tübingen Hawks48.6%202214
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 250.6%183179
3Neuenburg Atomics51.6%192180
4Stuttgart Reds 252.6%212191
5Göppingen Green Sox53.4%167146
 League Average53.9%191164
6Karlsruhe Cougars61.5%185116
7Nagold Mohawks62.5%198119

Stolen Bases

#TeamSBAtt.
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 287100
2Göppingen Green Sox7583
3Neuenburg Atomics6675
 League Average5970
4Karlsruhe Cougars5573
5Stuttgart Reds 24855
6Tübingen Hawks4456
7Nagold Mohawks4147

Stolen Base Percentage

#TeamSBPSBAtt.
1Göppingen Green Sox.9047583
2Neuenburg Atomics.8806675
3Stuttgart Reds 2.8734855
4Nagold Mohawks.8724147
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.87087100
 League Average.8515970
6Tübingen Hawks.7864456
7Karlsruhe Cougars.7535573

Different Starting Lineups Used

#TeamLineupsGames
1Nagold Mohawks2424
 Tübingen Hawks2424
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 22324
 Stuttgart Reds 22324
 Karlsruhe Cougars2324
 Neuenburg Atomics2324
 League Average23
7Göppingen Green Sox1824

Weighted Average Age

#TeamAge
1Nagold Mohawks30.4
2Karlsruhe Cougars28.8
3Tübingen Hawks28.4
4Göppingen Green Sox27.0
 League Average25.4
5Stuttgart Reds 221.5
6Neuenburg Atomics21.3
 Heidenheim Heideköpfe 221.3

Under-21 Players

#TeamPApctPAu21PA_allAVGSLGOBPOPS
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 269.2%612885.329.415.414.829
2Neuenburg Atomics63.5%561883.287.353.406.758
3Stuttgart Reds 258.4%541927.289.401.409.810
4Tübingen Hawks41.7%382916.319.452.445.897
 League Average36.2%317875.297.388.410.798
5Göppingen Green Sox9.4%79840.117.133.321.454
6Karlsruhe Cougars4.6%39841.147.147.256.403
7Nagold Mohawks0.4%3836.000.000.333.333

Defense

Fielding Percentage

#TeamFLDPOAE
1Tübingen Hawks.94151019644
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.93853920449
3Stuttgart Reds 2.92753421659
4Neuenburg Atomics.92352022762
 League Average.91652120666
5Göppingen Green Sox.89951321982
6Nagold Mohawks.89549618480
7Karlsruhe Cougars.89353219988

Putouts

#TeamPO
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2539
2Stuttgart Reds 2534
3Karlsruhe Cougars532
 League Average521
4Neuenburg Atomics520
5Göppingen Green Sox513
6Tübingen Hawks510
7Nagold Mohawks496

Assists

#TeamA
1Neuenburg Atomics227
2Göppingen Green Sox219
3Stuttgart Reds 2216
 League Average206
4Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2204
5Karlsruhe Cougars199
6Tübingen Hawks196
7Nagold Mohawks184

Errors

#TeamE
1Karlsruhe Cougars88
2Göppingen Green Sox82
3Nagold Mohawks80
 League Average66
4Neuenburg Atomics62
5Stuttgart Reds 259
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 249
7Tübingen Hawks44

Doubleplays

#TeamDP
1Neuenburg Atomics18
2Stuttgart Reds 216
 League Average12
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 212
 Göppingen Green Sox12
 Karlsruhe Cougars12
6Tübingen Hawks10
7Nagold Mohawks5

Passed Balls

#TeamPB
1Karlsruhe Cougars13
2Nagold Mohawks7
3Göppingen Green Sox5
 League Average4.9
4Stuttgart Reds 24
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 23
6Tübingen Hawks2
7Neuenburg Atomics0

Runners Caught Stealing

#TeamCSAtt.
1Tübingen Hawks1650
2Göppingen Green Sox1362
3Karlsruhe Cougars1286
4Neuenburg Atomics928
 League Average8.968
5Stuttgart Reds 2649
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2465
7Nagold Mohawks2138

Caught Stealing Average

#TeamCSACSAtt.
1Neuenburg Atomics.321928
2Tübingen Hawks.3201650
3Göppingen Green Sox.2101362
4Karlsruhe Cougars.1401286
 League Average.1308.968
5Stuttgart Reds 2.122649
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.062465
7Nagold Mohawks.0142138

Pitching

Earned Run Average

#TeamERA W  LIP ER   R   K BBK/BB
1Neuenburg Atomics2.86159173.15599152801.90
2Tübingen Hawks3.28177170.06289172891.93
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 24.11177179.2821231701171.45
4Stuttgart Reds 24.80159178.0951511151091.06
 League Average5.641212173.01091641351131.19
5Karlsruhe Cougars7.46816177.11472151411201.18
6Göppingen Green Sox7.74717171.0147226941310.72
7Nagold Mohawks9.42519165.11732421011480.68

Earned Run Average Starting Pitchers

#TeamERA W  LIP ER   R   K BBK/BBCG
1Tübingen Hawks2.00135112.12543149443.3911
2Neuenburg Atomics2.47146131.13663111492.2711
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 23.72125133.05580134911.477
4Stuttgart Reds 24.23117134.06310577631.226
 League Average5.139.710131.275114106771.3710.0
5Karlsruhe Cougars6.18815161.2111168133911.4617
6Nagold Mohawks8.42517128.1120167781120.7012
7Göppingen Green Sox8.65516119.211517358890.656

Earned Run Average Relief Pitchers

#TeamERA W  L  SIP ER   R   K BBK/BB
1Neuenburg Atomics4.0713242.0193641311.32
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 25.2152446.2274336261.38
3Göppingen Green Sox5.6121051.1325336420.86
4Tübingen Hawks5.7742257.2374623450.51
5Stuttgart Reds 26.5542144.0324638460.83
 League Average7.222.31.91.342.0344929360.80
6Nagold Mohawks12.8902037.0537523360.64
7Karlsruhe Cougars20.6801015.236478290.28

Strikeouts

#TeamKIPK/IP
1Tübingen Hawks172170.01.01
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2170179.20.95
3Neuenburg Atomics152173.10.88
4Karlsruhe Cougars141177.10.80
 League Average135173.00.78
5Stuttgart Reds 2115178.00.65
6Nagold Mohawks101165.10.61
7Göppingen Green Sox94171.00.55

Strikeouts per Inning (most)

#TeamK/IP  K   IP
1Tübingen Hawks1.01172170.0
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 20.95170179.2
3Neuenburg Atomics0.88152173.1
4Karlsruhe Cougars0.80141177.1
 League Average0.78135173.0
5Stuttgart Reds 20.65115178.0
6Nagold Mohawks0.61101165.1
7Göppingen Green Sox0.5594171.0

Walks

#TeamBBIPBB/IP
1Neuenburg Atomics80173.10.46
2Tübingen Hawks89170.00.52
3Stuttgart Reds 2109178.00.61
 League Average113173.00.65
4Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2117179.20.65
5Karlsruhe Cougars120177.10.68
6Göppingen Green Sox131171.00.77
7Nagold Mohawks148165.10.90

Walks per Inning (fewest)

#TeamBB/IPBBIP
1Neuenburg Atomics0.4680173.1
2Tübingen Hawks0.5289170.0
3Stuttgart Reds 20.61109178.0
4Heidenheim Heideköpfe 20.65117179.2
 League Average0.65113173.0
5Karlsruhe Cougars0.68120177.1
6Göppingen Green Sox0.77131171.0
7Nagold Mohawks0.90148165.1

Strikeout to Walk Ratio

#TeamK/BBKBB
1Tübingen Hawks1.9317289
2Neuenburg Atomics1.9015280
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 21.45170117
 League Average1.19135113
4Karlsruhe Cougars1.18141120
5Stuttgart Reds 21.06115109
6Göppingen Green Sox0.7294131
7Nagold Mohawks0.68101148

Baserunners per Inning (fewest)

#TeamWHIPBF/IPHBBBFIP
1Neuenburg Atomics1.294.4414380770173.1
2Tübingen Hawks1.384.4814689761170.0
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 21.684.86184117873179.2
 League Average1.805.05199113875173.0
4Stuttgart Reds 21.835.00216109890178.0
5Karlsruhe Cougars2.005.42234120961177.1
6Göppingen Green Sox2.185.44241131931171.0
7Nagold Mohawks2.295.70231148942165.1

Opponents Batting Average (lowest)

#TeamOAVGABHKBBHR
1Neuenburg Atomics.219654143152802
2Tübingen Hawks.229638146172891
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2.2577161841701171
 League Average.2787171991351133.0
4Stuttgart Reds 2.2887492161151093
5Karlsruhe Cougars.2987852341411205
6Göppingen Green Sox.319756241941315
7Nagold Mohawks.3207232311011484

Runs Allowed

#TeamRERER/R
1Tübingen Hawks896270%
2Neuenburg Atomics995556%
3Heidenheim Heideköpfe 21238267%
4Stuttgart Reds 21519563%
 League Average16410966%
5Karlsruhe Cougars21514768%
6Göppingen Green Sox22614765%
7Nagold Mohawks24217371%

Homeruns allowed

#TeamHR
1Göppingen Green Sox5
 Karlsruhe Cougars5
3Nagold Mohawks4
 League Average3.0
4Stuttgart Reds 23
5Neuenburg Atomics2
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 21
 Tübingen Hawks1

Hit Batsmen

#TeamHB
1Karlsruhe Cougars38
2Nagold Mohawks36
3Neuenburg Atomics28
 League Average27
4Göppingen Green Sox25
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 224
6Tübingen Hawks20
7Stuttgart Reds 215

Wild Pitches

#TeamWP
1Karlsruhe Cougars48
2Nagold Mohawks45
3Stuttgart Reds 243
4Göppingen Green Sox36
 League Average33
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 223
6Tübingen Hawks19
7Neuenburg Atomics15

Wins

#TeamWLPCT
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2177.708
 Tübingen Hawks177.708
3Stuttgart Reds 2159.625
 Neuenburg Atomics159.625
 League Average1212.500
5Karlsruhe Cougars816.333
6Göppingen Green Sox717.292
7Nagold Mohawks519.208

Saves

#TeamS
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 24
2Neuenburg Atomics2
 Tübingen Hawks2
 League Average1.3
4Stuttgart Reds 21
5Göppingen Green Sox0
 Nagold Mohawks0
 Karlsruhe Cougars0

Batters Faced

#TeamBFIPBF/IP
1Karlsruhe Cougars961177.15.42
2Nagold Mohawks942165.15.70
3Göppingen Green Sox931171.05.44
4Stuttgart Reds 2890178.05.00
 League Average875173.05.05
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2873179.24.86
6Neuenburg Atomics770173.14.44
7Tübingen Hawks761170.04.48

Innings Pitched

#TeamIP
1Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2179.2
2Stuttgart Reds 2178.0
3Karlsruhe Cougars177.1
 League Average173.0
4Neuenburg Atomics173.1
5Göppingen Green Sox171.0
6Tübingen Hawks170.0
7Nagold Mohawks165.1

IP by Starters

#TeamIP%IP SPIP RPG CG
1Karlsruhe Cougars91.2%161.215.22417
2Nagold Mohawks77.6%128.137.02412
3Neuenburg Atomics75.8%131.142.02411
 League Average75.8%131.142.02410
4Stuttgart Reds 275.3%134.044.0246
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 274.0%133.046.2247
6Göppingen Green Sox70.0%119.251.1246
7Tübingen Hawks66.1%112.157.22411

Complete Games

#TeamCGG
1Karlsruhe Cougars1724
2Nagold Mohawks1224
3Neuenburg Atomics1124
 Tübingen Hawks1124
 League Average1024
5Heidenheim Heideköpfe 2724
6Stuttgart Reds 2624
 Göppingen Green Sox624

Shutouts

#TeamSho
1Tübingen Hawks5
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 23
 Neuenburg Atomics3
 League Average1.6

Unearned Runs

#TeamUERRIPUERA
1Göppingen Green Sox79226171.04.16
2Nagold Mohawks69242165.13.76
3Karlsruhe Cougars68215177.13.45
4Stuttgart Reds 256151178.02.83
 League Average55164173.02.85
5Neuenburg Atomics4499173.12.28
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 241123179.22.05
7Tübingen Hawks2789170.01.43

Weighted Average Age

#TeamAge
1Karlsruhe Cougars29.7
2Nagold Mohawks28.7
3Tübingen Hawks24.6
 League Average24.5
4Göppingen Green Sox23.9
5Stuttgart Reds 223.0
6Heidenheim Heideköpfe 222.4
7Neuenburg Atomics19.3

Under-21 Players

#TeamIPpctIPu21IP_allERAK/IPWHIPOAVGOOPS
1Neuenburg Atomics84.4%146.1173.13.010.871.26.223.595
2Heidenheim Heideköpfe 255.1%99.0179.23.001.231.59.214.637
3Tübingen Hawks51.0%86.2170.05.300.621.97.288.763
4Stuttgart Reds 241.8%74.1178.06.300.852.13.273.741
 League Average37.4%64.0173.24.960.851.76.256.705
5Göppingen Green Sox27.9%47.2171.012.270.422.64.343.960
6Nagold Mohawks0.0%0.0165.1---------------
 Karlsruhe Cougars0.0%0.0177.1---------------


Key to abbreviations:
Offense
AVG: Batting Average; AB: At Bats; H: Hits; HR: Home Runs; R: Runs scored; SLG: Slugging Percentage; TB: Total Bases; 1B: Singles; 2B: Doubles; 3B: Triples; HR: Home Runs; TB/H: Total Bases per Hit (average "length" of team's hits); OBP: On-Base Percentage; BB: Bases on Balls (Walks); HP: Times Hit by a Pitch; SF: Sacrifice Flies; OPS: On-Base Plus Slugging; R: Runs scored; R-: Runs allowed; diff: Run difference; BB/PA: Walks per Plate Appearance; PA: Plate Appearance; K: Strikeouts; K/AB: Strikeouts per At Bat; SH: Sacrifice Hits (Bunts); LOB%: Percentage of stranded baserunners (calculated as LOB/[R+LOB]); LOB: Leoft On Base;; SB: Stolen Bases; Att: Steal Attempts; SBP: Stolen Base Percentage; Age: Weighted Average Age calculated by multiplying each player's age on 1st of July times their total PA divided by the total of PA for the team; Under-21 Players: Percentage of Plate Appearances of players aged 21 years or younger
Defense
FLD: Fielding Percentage; PO: Putouts; A: Assists; E: Errors; DP: Double Plays; PB: Passed Balls; CS: Runners Caught Stealing; Att.: Steal Attempts; CSA: Caught Stealing Average
Pitching
ERA: Earned Run Average; W: Wins; L: Losses; IP: Innings Pitched; ER: Earned Runs; R: Runs; K: Strikeouts; BB: Bases on Balls (Walks); K/BB: Strikeout to Walk ratio; CG: Complete Games; S: Saves; K/IP: Strikeouts per Inning Pitched; BB/IP: Walks per Inning Pitched; WHIP: Baserunners per Inning Pitched [(BB+H)/IP]; BF/IP: Batters faced per Inning Pitched; OAVG: Opponents Batting Average; AB: official At Bats against; ER/R: Ratio of Earned Runs to total runs allowed; HB: Hit Batsmen; WP: Wild Pitches; PCT: Winning percentage; IP%: Percentage of Innings Pitched by starters; IP SP: Innings pitched by Starting Pitchers; IP RP: Innings pitched by Relief Pitchers; G: Games; CG: Complete Games; Sho: Shutouts; UER: Uneraned Runs; UERA: Unearned Run Average; Age: Weighted Average Age calculated by multiplying each player's age on 1st of July times their Innings Pitched divided by the team's total IP; Under-21 Players: Percentage of Innings Pitched of players aged 21 years or younger

 


| © Deutscher Baseball & Softball Verband e.V. 2005 - Alle Rechte vorbehalten |