DBV

Bundesliga




Alle Spieler
2010
2009
2008

Playoffs
Playdowns Nord
Playdowns Süd
Nord
Süd

Nord
Süd

Nordwest
Nordost
Südwest
Südost

DM
Playoffs
Playdowns Süd
Nord
Süd

2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994

Impressum

Statistiken Deutscher Baseball und Softball Verband

Stand: 2008-07-27

League Overview | League Leaders | Team Ranking | Highs & Lows: Players/Teams

Team Ranking 1. Bundesliga Süd

Offense

Batting Average

#	Team	AVG	AB	H	HR	R
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.328	1008	331	11	251
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	.307	937	288	17	195
3	Mannheim Tornados	.287	933	268	17	197
4	Mainz Athletics	.275	964	265	13	164
	League Average	.260	919	239	9.0	152
5	Saarlouis Hornets	.233	872	203	5	119
6	Gauting Indians	.220	903	199	4	118
7	Haar Disciples	.219	898	197	5	104
8	Neuenburg Atomics	.192	837	161	0	69

Slugging Percentage

#	Team	SLG	AB	TB	1B	2B	3B	HR	TB/H
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.442	1008	446	244	70	6	11	1.35
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	.412	937	386	227	41	3	17	1.34
3	Mannheim Tornados	.411	933	383	199	40	12	17	1.43
4	Mainz Athletics	.376	964	362	196	54	2	13	1.37
	League Average	.344	919	316	185	40	4.9	9.0	1.32
5	Saarlouis Hornets	.307	872	268	155	36	7	5	1.32
6	Haar Disciples	.284	898	255	154	33	5	5	1.29
7	Gauting Indians	.262	903	237	170	24	1	4	1.19
8	Neuenburg Atomics	.229	837	192	133	25	3	0	1.19

On-Base Percentage

#	Team	OBP	AB	H	BB	HP	SF
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.418	1008	331	129	40	18
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	.412	937	288	123	48	6
3	Mainz Athletics	.385	964	265	156	24	11
4	Mannheim Tornados	.381	933	268	120	34	22
	League Average	.355	919	239	111	30	10
5	Saarlouis Hornets	.331	872	203	104	30	11
6	Gauting Indians	.318	903	199	101	30	3
7	Haar Disciples	.292	898	197	86	7	3
8	Neuenburg Atomics	.270	837	161	68	23	7

On-Base Plus Slugging

#	Team	OPS	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	HP	SF
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.861	1008	331	70	6	11	129	40	18
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	.824	937	288	41	3	17	123	48	6
3	Mannheim Tornados	.791	933	268	40	12	17	120	34	22
4	Mainz Athletics	.761	964	265	54	2	13	156	24	11
	League Average	.699	919	239	40	4.9	9.0	111	30	10
5	Saarlouis Hornets	.639	872	203	36	7	5	104	30	11
6	Gauting Indians	.581	903	199	24	1	4	101	30	3
7	Haar Disciples	.576	898	197	33	5	5	86	7	3
8	Neuenburg Atomics	.499	837	161	25	3	0	68	23	7

Hits

#	Team	H	1B	2B	3B	HR
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	331	244	70	6	11
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	288	227	41	3	17
3	Mannheim Tornados	268	199	40	12	17
4	Mainz Athletics	265	196	54	2	13
	League Average	239	185	40	4.9	9.0
5	Saarlouis Hornets	203	155	36	7	5
6	Gauting Indians	199	170	24	1	4
7	Haar Disciples	197	154	33	5	5
8	Neuenburg Atomics	161	133	25	3	0

Doubles

#	Team	2B
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	70
2	Mainz Athletics	54
3	Buchbinder Legionäre	41
	League Average	40
4	Mannheim Tornados	40
5	Saarlouis Hornets	36
6	Haar Disciples	33
7	Neuenburg Atomics	25
8	Gauting Indians	24

Triples

#	Team	3B
1	Mannheim Tornados	12
2	Saarlouis Hornets	7
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	6
4	Haar Disciples	5
	League Average	4.9
5	Buchbinder Legionäre	3
	Neuenburg Atomics	3
7	Mainz Athletics	2
8	Gauting Indians	1

Homeruns

#	Team	HR
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	17
	Mannheim Tornados	17
3	Mainz Athletics	13
4	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	11
	League Average	9.0
5	Haar Disciples	5
	Saarlouis Hornets	5
7	Gauting Indians	4
8	Neuenburg Atomics	0

Runs Scored

#	Team	R	R-	diff
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	251	106	+145
2	Mannheim Tornados	197	91	+106
3	Buchbinder Legionäre	195	78	+117
4	Mainz Athletics	164	152	+12
	League Average	152	152	0
5	Saarlouis Hornets	119	168	-49
6	Gauting Indians	118	206	-88
7	Haar Disciples	104	165	-61
8	Neuenburg Atomics	69	251	-182

Walks

#	Team	BB	IBB
1	Mainz Athletics	156	5
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	129	4
3	Buchbinder Legionäre	123	5
4	Mannheim Tornados	120	2
	League Average	111	3.1
5	Saarlouis Hornets	104	4
6	Gauting Indians	101	0
7	Haar Disciples	86	4
8	Neuenburg Atomics	68	1

Walk Ratio (highest)

#	Team	BB/PA	BB	PA
1	Mainz Athletics	13.3%	156	1170
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	10.7%	129	1204
	Buchbinder Legionäre	10.7%	123	1152
4	Mannheim Tornados	10.5%	120	1138
	League Average	10.2%	111	1089
5	Saarlouis Hornets	10.0%	104	1042
6	Gauting Indians	9.6%	101	1055
7	Haar Disciples	8.5%	86	1007
8	Neuenburg Atomics	7.2%	68	946

Intentional Walks

#	Team	IBB	BB
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	5	123
	Mainz Athletics	5	156
3	Haar Disciples	4	86
	Saarlouis Hornets	4	104
	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	4	129
	League Average	3.1	111
6	Mannheim Tornados	2	120
7	Neuenburg Atomics	1	68
8	Gauting Indians	0	101

Strikeouts

#	Team	K
1	Neuenburg Atomics	243
2	Mainz Athletics	215
3	Haar Disciples	211
4	Gauting Indians	210
	League Average	184
5	Saarlouis Hornets	176
6	Buchbinder Legionäre	158
7	Mannheim Tornados	138
8	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	122

Strikeout Ratio (lowest)

#	Team	K/AB	K	AB
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	12.1%	122	1008
2	Mannheim Tornados	14.8%	138	933
3	Buchbinder Legionäre	16.9%	158	937
	League Average	20.0%	184	919
4	Saarlouis Hornets	20.2%	176	872
5	Mainz Athletics	22.3%	215	964
6	Gauting Indians	23.3%	210	903
7	Haar Disciples	23.5%	211	898
8	Neuenburg Atomics	29.0%	243	837

Hit By Pitch

#	Team	HP
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	48
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	40
3	Mannheim Tornados	34
4	Gauting Indians	30
	Saarlouis Hornets	30
	League Average	30
6	Mainz Athletics	24
7	Neuenburg Atomics	23
8	Haar Disciples	7

Sacrifice Flies

#	Team	SF
1	Mannheim Tornados	22
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	18
3	Mainz Athletics	11
	Saarlouis Hornets	11
	League Average	10
5	Neuenburg Atomics	7
6	Buchbinder Legionäre	6
7	Gauting Indians	3
	Haar Disciples	3

Sacrifice Hits

#	Team	SH
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	36
2	Mannheim Tornados	29
3	Saarlouis Hornets	25
	League Average	19
4	Gauting Indians	16
5	Mainz Athletics	15
6	Haar Disciples	13
7	Neuenburg Atomics	11
8	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	8

Percentage of Baserunners Stranded

#	Team	LOB%	LOB	R
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	50.2%	253	251
2	Mannheim Tornados	53.1%	223	197
3	Buchbinder Legionäre	57.0%	244	184
	League Average	59.7%	224	151
4	Mainz Athletics	62.5%	282	169
5	Saarlouis Hornets	64.0%	212	119
6	Haar Disciples	64.1%	186	104
7	Gauting Indians	64.7%	216	118
8	Neuenburg Atomics	71.7%	175	69

Stolen Bases

#	Team	SB	Att.
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	68	90
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	65	74
3	Gauting Indians	48	60
	League Average	41	52
4	Saarlouis Hornets	39	52
5	Mannheim Tornados	31	40
	Neuenburg Atomics	31	46
7	Mainz Athletics	28	33
8	Haar Disciples	19	22

Stolen Base Percentage

#	Team	SBP	SB	Att.
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.878	65	74
2	Haar Disciples	.864	19	22
3	Mainz Athletics	.848	28	33
4	Gauting Indians	.800	48	60
	League Average	.789	41	52
5	Mannheim Tornados	.775	31	40
6	Buchbinder Legionäre	.756	68	90
7	Saarlouis Hornets	.750	39	52
8	Neuenburg Atomics	.674	31	46

Different Starting Lineups Used

#	Team	Lineups	Games
1	Mannheim Tornados	28	28
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	26	28
	Gauting Indians	26	28
	League Average	24
4	Haar Disciples	24	28
	Neuenburg Atomics	24	28
	Saarlouis Hornets	24	28
7	Mainz Athletics	22	28
8	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	21	28

Weighted Average Age

#	Team	Age
1	Saarlouis Hornets	28.0
2	Neuenburg Atomics	27.3
3	Haar Disciples	25.6
4	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	25.4
	League Average	25.3
5	Mannheim Tornados	24.9
6	Buchbinder Legionäre	24.4
7	Gauting Indians	23.7
8	Mainz Athletics	23.4

Defense

Fielding Percentage

#	Team	FLD	PO	A	E
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.966	728	335	37
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	.962	734	292	40
3	Mainz Athletics	.957	732	315	47
4	Mannheim Tornados	.955	727	303	48
	League Average	.944	713	314	61
5	Haar Disciples	.935	708	303	70
6	Saarlouis Hornets	.934	700	327	72
7	Gauting Indians	.932	703	318	75
8	Neuenburg Atomics	.908	674	315	100

Putouts

#	Team	PO
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	734
2	Mainz Athletics	732
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	728
4	Mannheim Tornados	727
	League Average	713
5	Haar Disciples	708
6	Gauting Indians	703
7	Saarlouis Hornets	700
8	Neuenburg Atomics	674

Assists

#	Team	A
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	335
2	Saarlouis Hornets	327
3	Gauting Indians	318
4	Mainz Athletics	315
	Neuenburg Atomics	315
	League Average	314
6	Mannheim Tornados	303
	Haar Disciples	303
8	Buchbinder Legionäre	292

Errors

#	Team	E
1	Neuenburg Atomics	100
2	Gauting Indians	75
3	Saarlouis Hornets	72
4	Haar Disciples	70
	League Average	61
5	Mannheim Tornados	48
6	Mainz Athletics	47
7	Buchbinder Legionäre	40
8	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	37

Doubleplays

#	Team	DP
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	35
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	27
	League Average	23
3	Haar Disciples	23
4	Mainz Athletics	21
	Mannheim Tornados	21
	Neuenburg Atomics	21
7	Saarlouis Hornets	20
8	Gauting Indians	19

Passed Balls

#	Team	PB
1	Saarlouis Hornets	23
2	Gauting Indians	16
3	Haar Disciples	13
	League Average	10
4	Mainz Athletics	9
5	Buchbinder Legionäre	7
6	Mannheim Tornados	6
7	Neuenburg Atomics	4
8	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	3

Runners Caught Stealing

#	Team	CS	Att.
1	Neuenburg Atomics	16	38
2	Gauting Indians	14	92
3	Mannheim Tornados	12	30
	Saarlouis Hornets	12	61
	League Average	11	52
5	Buchbinder Legionäre	11	35
6	Haar Disciples	10	85
7	Mainz Athletics	8	55
8	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	5	21

Caught Stealing Average

#	Team	CSA	CS	Att.
1	Neuenburg Atomics	.421	16	38
2	Mannheim Tornados	.400	12	30
3	Buchbinder Legionäre	.314	11	35
4	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.238	5	21
	League Average	.211	11	52
5	Saarlouis Hornets	.197	12	61
6	Gauting Indians	.152	14	92
7	Mainz Athletics	.145	8	55
8	Haar Disciples	.118	10	85

Pitching

Earned Run Average

#	Team	ERA	W	L	IP	ER	R	K	BB	K/BB
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	2.06	20	7	244.2	56	78	249	98	2.54
2	Mannheim Tornados	2.15	18	10	242.1	58	91	244	72	3.39
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	3.15	23	5	242.2	85	106	163	78	2.09
4	Mainz Athletics	4.06	17	10	244.0	110	152	219	110	1.99
	League Average	4.07	14	14	237.1	108	152	184	111	1.66
5	Haar Disciples	4.61	10	18	236.0	121	165	158	92	1.72
6	Saarlouis Hornets	4.67	11	17	233.1	121	168	165	137	1.20
7	Gauting Indians	5.49	8	20	234.1	143	206	162	176	0.92
8	Neuenburg Atomics	6.65	4	24	224.2	166	251	113	124	0.91

Earned Run Average Starting Pitchers

#	Team	ERA	W	L	IP	ER	R	K	BB	K/BB	CG
1	Mannheim Tornados	1.83	13	8	176.2	36	55	188	51	3.69	3
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	1.85	11	4	146.1	30	43	154	61	2.52	2
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	2.72	18	1	168.2	51	63	99	51	1.94	2
4	Mainz Athletics	3.47	14	10	184.0	71	101	169	75	2.25	7
	League Average	3.84	11	12	175.1	75	107	136	74	1.84	6.8
5	Saarlouis Hornets	4.03	9	17	183.0	82	120	129	87	1.48	7
6	Haar Disciples	4.29	7	14	157.1	75	107	104	56	1.86	2
7	Gauting Indians	5.36	8	20	193.0	115	158	148	123	1.20	12
8	Neuenburg Atomics	6.45	4	23	192.2	138	209	99	89	1.11	19

Earned Run Average Relief Pitchers

#	Team	ERA	W	L	S	IP	ER	R	K	BB	K/BB
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	2.38	9	3	8	98.1	26	35	95	37	2.57
2	Mannheim Tornados	3.02	5	2	3	65.2	22	36	56	21	2.67
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	4.14	5	4	6	74.0	34	43	64	27	2.37
	League Average	4.71	3.4	1.8	4.3	62.0	33	45	48	37	1.30
4	Haar Disciples	5.26	3	4	6	78.2	46	58	54	36	1.50
5	Mainz Athletics	5.85	3	0	4	60.0	39	51	50	35	1.43
6	Gauting Indians	6.10	0	0	1	41.1	28	48	14	53	0.26
7	Saarlouis Hornets	6.97	2	0	5	50.1	39	48	36	50	0.72
8	Neuenburg Atomics	7.88	0	1	1	32.0	28	42	14	35	0.40

Strikeouts

#	Team	K	IP	K/IP
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	249	244.2	1.02
2	Mannheim Tornados	244	242.1	1.01
3	Mainz Athletics	219	244.0	0.90
	League Average	184	237.1	0.77
4	Saarlouis Hornets	165	233.1	0.71
5	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	163	242.2	0.67
6	Gauting Indians	162	234.1	0.69
7	Haar Disciples	158	236.0	0.67
8	Neuenburg Atomics	113	224.2	0.50

Strikeouts per Inning (most)

#	Team	K/IP	K	IP
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	1.02	249	244.2
2	Mannheim Tornados	1.01	244	242.1
3	Mainz Athletics	0.90	219	244.0
	League Average	0.77	184	237.1
4	Saarlouis Hornets	0.71	165	233.1
5	Gauting Indians	0.69	162	234.1
6	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	0.67	163	242.2
	Haar Disciples	0.67	158	236.0
8	Neuenburg Atomics	0.50	113	224.2

Walks

#	Team	BB	IP	BB/IP	IBB
1	Mannheim Tornados	72	242.1	0.30	6
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	78	242.2	0.32	2
3	Haar Disciples	92	236.0	0.39	2
4	Buchbinder Legionäre	98	244.2	0.40	5
5	Mainz Athletics	110	244.0	0.45	6
	League Average	111	237.1	0.47	3.1
6	Neuenburg Atomics	124	224.2	0.55	0
7	Saarlouis Hornets	137	233.1	0.59	2
8	Gauting Indians	176	234.1	0.75	2

Walks per Inning (fewest)

#	Team	BB/IP	BB	IP
1	Mannheim Tornados	0.30	72	242.1
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	0.32	78	242.2
3	Haar Disciples	0.39	92	236.0
4	Buchbinder Legionäre	0.40	98	244.2
5	Mainz Athletics	0.45	110	244.0
	League Average	0.47	111	237.1
6	Neuenburg Atomics	0.55	124	224.2
7	Saarlouis Hornets	0.59	137	233.1
8	Gauting Indians	0.75	176	234.1

Intentional Walks

#	Team	IBB	BB	IP
1	Mannheim Tornados	6	72	242.1
	Mainz Athletics	6	110	244.0
3	Buchbinder Legionäre	5	98	244.2
	League Average	3.1	111	237.1
4	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	2	78	242.2
	Haar Disciples	2	92	236.0
	Saarlouis Hornets	2	137	233.1
	Gauting Indians	2	176	234.1
8	Neuenburg Atomics	0	124	224.2

Strikeout to Walk Ratio

#	Team	K/BB	K	BB
1	Mannheim Tornados	3.39	244	72
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	2.54	249	98
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	2.09	163	78
4	Mainz Athletics	1.99	219	110
5	Haar Disciples	1.72	158	92
	League Average	1.66	184	111
6	Saarlouis Hornets	1.20	165	137
7	Gauting Indians	0.92	162	176
8	Neuenburg Atomics	0.91	113	124

Baserunners per Inning (fewest)

#	Team	WHIP	BF/IP	H	BB	BF	IP
1	Mannheim Tornados	1.03	4.08	177	72	989	242.1
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	1.07	4.19	163	98	1024	244.2
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	1.29	4.26	234	78	1034	242.2
4	Mainz Athletics	1.40	4.51	231	110	1101	244.0
	League Average	1.47	4.58	239	111	1089	237.1
5	Haar Disciples	1.52	4.69	267	92	1106	236.0
6	Saarlouis Hornets	1.62	4.74	241	137	1105	233.1
7	Gauting Indians	1.87	5.03	263	176	1179	234.1
8	Neuenburg Atomics	2.05	5.23	336	124	1176	224.2

Opponents Batting Average (lowest)

#	Team	OAVG	AB	H	K	BB	HR
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	.188	865	163	249	98	8
2	Mannheim Tornados	.202	876	177	244	72	6
3	Mainz Athletics	.251	919	231	219	110	3
4	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	.257	909	234	163	78	14
	League Average	.260	919	239	184	111	9.0
5	Saarlouis Hornets	.266	906	241	165	137	11
6	Gauting Indians	.281	937	263	162	176	11
7	Haar Disciples	.282	948	267	158	92	4
8	Neuenburg Atomics	.339	992	336	113	124	15

Runs Allowed

#	Team	R	ER	ER/R
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	78	56	72%
2	Mannheim Tornados	91	58	64%
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	106	85	80%
4	Mainz Athletics	152	110	72%
	League Average	152	108	71%
5	Haar Disciples	165	121	73%
6	Saarlouis Hornets	168	121	72%
7	Gauting Indians	206	143	69%
8	Neuenburg Atomics	251	166	66%

Homeruns allowed

#	Team	HR
1	Neuenburg Atomics	15
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	14
3	Gauting Indians	11
	Saarlouis Hornets	11
	League Average	9.0
5	Buchbinder Legionäre	8
6	Mannheim Tornados	6
7	Haar Disciples	4
8	Mainz Athletics	3

Hit Batsmen

#	Team	HB
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	38
2	Mainz Athletics	37
3	Gauting Indians	34
4	Neuenburg Atomics	30
	League Average	30
5	Haar Disciples	28
6	Saarlouis Hornets	25
7	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	22
	Mannheim Tornados	22

Wild Pitches

#	Team	WP
1	Gauting Indians	52
2	Neuenburg Atomics	30
3	Saarlouis Hornets	29
4	Haar Disciples	28
	League Average	26
5	Mainz Athletics	25
6	Buchbinder Legionäre	16
7	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	14
8	Mannheim Tornados	13

Wins

#	Team	W	L	PCT
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	23	5	.821
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	20	7	.741
3	Mannheim Tornados	18	10	.643
4	Mainz Athletics	17	10	.630
	League Average	14	14	.500
5	Saarlouis Hornets	11	17	.393
6	Haar Disciples	10	18	.357
7	Gauting Indians	8	20	.286
8	Neuenburg Atomics	4	24	.143

Saves

#	Team	S
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	8
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	6
	Haar Disciples	6
4	Saarlouis Hornets	5
	League Average	4.3
5	Mainz Athletics	4
6	Mannheim Tornados	3
7	Gauting Indians	1
	Neuenburg Atomics	1

Batters Faced

#	Team	BF	IP	BF/IP
1	Gauting Indians	1179	234.1	5.03
2	Neuenburg Atomics	1176	224.2	5.23
3	Haar Disciples	1106	236.0	4.69
4	Saarlouis Hornets	1105	233.1	4.74
5	Mainz Athletics	1101	244.0	4.51
	League Average	1089	237.1	4.58
6	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	1034	242.2	4.26
7	Buchbinder Legionäre	1024	244.2	4.19
8	Mannheim Tornados	989	242.1	4.08

Innings Pitched

#	Team	IP
1	Buchbinder Legionäre	244.2
2	Mainz Athletics	244.0
3	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	242.2
4	Mannheim Tornados	242.1
	League Average	237.1
5	Haar Disciples	236.0
6	Gauting Indians	234.1
7	Saarlouis Hornets	233.1
8	Neuenburg Atomics	224.2

IP by Starters

#	Team	IP%	IP SP	IP RP	G	CG
1	Neuenburg Atomics	85.8%	192.2	32.0	28	19
2	Gauting Indians	82.4%	193.0	41.1	28	12
3	Saarlouis Hornets	78.4%	183.0	50.1	28	7
4	Mainz Athletics	75.4%	184.0	60.0	28	7
	League Average	73.7%	175.0	62.1	28	6.8
5	Mannheim Tornados	72.9%	176.2	65.2	28	3
6	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	69.5%	168.2	74.0	28	2
7	Haar Disciples	66.7%	157.1	78.2	28	2
8	Buchbinder Legionäre	59.8%	146.1	98.1	28	2

Complete Games

#	Team	CG	G
1	Neuenburg Atomics	19	28
2	Gauting Indians	12	28
3	Mainz Athletics	7	28
	Saarlouis Hornets	7	28
	League Average	6.8	28
5	Mannheim Tornados	3	28
6	Buchbinder Legionäre	2	28
	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	2	28
	Haar Disciples	2	28

Shutouts

#	Team	Sho
1	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	5
2	Buchbinder Legionäre	4
	Mainz Athletics	4
	Mannheim Tornados	4
5	Haar Disciples	3
	League Average	2.8
6	Gauting Indians	1
	Saarlouis Hornets	1

Unearned Runs

#	Team	UER	R	IP	UERA
1	Neuenburg Atomics	85	251	224.2	3.41
2	Gauting Indians	63	206	234.1	2.42
3	Saarlouis Hornets	47	168	233.1	1.81
	League Average	45	152	237.1	1.69
4	Haar Disciples	44	165	236.0	1.68
5	Mainz Athletics	42	152	244.0	1.55
6	Mannheim Tornados	33	91	242.1	1.23
7	Buchbinder Legionäre	22	78	244.2	0.81
8	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	21	106	242.2	0.78

Weighted Average Age

#	Team	Age
1	Neuenburg Atomics	29.0
2	Heidenheim Heideköpfe	28.5
3	Mannheim Tornados	27.7
	League Average	25.8
4	Haar Disciples	24.7
5	Saarlouis Hornets	24.6
6	Gauting Indians	24.5
7	Buchbinder Legionäre	23.9
8	Mainz Athletics	23.6

Key to abbreviations:
Offense
AVG: Batting Average; AB: At Bats; H: Hits; HR: Home Runs; R: Runs scored; SLG: Slugging Percentage; TB: Total Bases; 1B: Singles; 2B: Doubles; 3B: Triples; HR: Home Runs; TB/H: Total Bases per Hit (average "length" of team's hits); OBP: On-Base Percentage; BB: Bases on Balls (Walks); HP: Times Hit by a Pitch; SF: Sacrifice Flies; OPS: On-Base Plus Slugging; R: Runs scored; R-: Runs allowed; diff: Run difference; BB/PA: Walks per Plate Appearance; PA: Plate Appearance; IBB: Intentional Bases on Balls; K: Strikeouts; K/AB: Strikeouts per At Bat; SH: Sacrifice Hits (Bunts); LOB%: Percentage of stranded baserunners (calculated as LOB/[R+LOB]); LOB: Leoft On Base;; SB: Stolen Bases; Att: Steal Attempts; SBP: Stolen Base Percentage; Age: Weighted Average Age calculated by multiplying each player's age on 1st of July times the number of At Bats divided by the team's total AB
Defense
FLD: Fielding Percentage; PO: Putouts; A: Assists; E: Errors; DP: Double Plays; PB: Passed Balls; CS: Runners Caught Stealing; Att.: Steal Attempts; CSA: Caught Stealing Average
Pitching
ERA: Earned Run Average; W: Wins; L: Losses; IP: Innings Pitched; ER: Earned Runs; R: Runs; K: Strikeouts; BB: Bases on Balls (Walks); K/BB: Strikeout to Walk ratio; CG: Complete Games; S: Saves; K/IP: Strikeouts per Inning Pitched; BB/IP: Walks per Inning Pitched; IBB: Intentional Bases on Balls (Walks); WHIP: Baserunners per Inning Pitched [(BB+H)/IP]; BF/IP: Batters faced per Inning Pitched; OAVG: Opponents Batting Average; AB: official At Bats against; ER/R: Ratio of Earned Runs to total runs allowed; HB: Hit Batsmen; WP: Wild Pitches; PCT: Winning percentage; IP%: Percentage of Innings Pitched by starters; IP SP: Innings pitched by Starting Pitchers; IP RP: Innings pitched by Relief Pitchers; G: Games; CG: Complete Games; Sho: Shutouts; UER: Uneraned Runs; UERA: Unearned Run Average; Age: Weighted Average Age calculated by multiplying each player's age on 1st of July times their Innings Pitched divided by the team's total IP

League Overview | League Leaders | Team Ranking | Highs & Lows: Players/Teams